<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:ymaps="http://api.maps.yahoo.com/Maps/V2/AnnotatedMaps.xsd">

<channel>
	<title>TribeSound Records - Mastering &#38; Recording Studio Philadelphia, PA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com</link>
	<description>Recording Studio / Record Label in West Chester, PA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:17:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>TribeSound Recording Studio and Mastering &#8211; Philadelphia, PA</title>
		<link>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/tribesound-recording-studio-and-mastering-philadelphia-pa</link>
		<comments>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/tribesound-recording-studio-and-mastering-philadelphia-pa#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/?p=788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TribeSound Records is a recording studio in West Chester just outside of Philadelphia PA.  Our studios are equipped with analog gear which provide our rich warm sound and state of the art digital converters for editing flexibility. We supply our clients with top quality recordings and the necessary information to help them develop into a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TribeSound Records is a recording studio in West Chester just outside of Philadelphia PA.  Our  studios are equipped with analog gear which provide our rich warm sound  and state of the art digital converters for editing flexibility.  We  supply our clients with top quality recordings and the necessary  information to help them develop into a well organized and educated  business in the music industry.</p>
<p>Recording Studios Philadelphia, PA<br />
Recording Music Studio<br />
Local Recording Studios<br />
Recording Studio Delaware</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/tribesound-recording-studio-and-mastering-philadelphia-pa/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Avid HD IO &#8211; Oh It&#8217;s on Now!</title>
		<link>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/avid-hd-io-oh-its-on-now</link>
		<comments>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/avid-hd-io-oh-its-on-now#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 22:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gear Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/?p=695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; Since we&#8217;ve tried to set up the Pro Tools HD Native card it&#8217;s been obvious that not every hardware and software manufacturer play nice together.  So instead of dealing with any of this crap any more we decided to take the plunge and buy the newest top of the line converters [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-700" title="HD IO" src="http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/HD-IO.jpg" alt="" width="458" height="110" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Since we&#8217;ve tried to set up the Pro Tools HD Native card it&#8217;s been obvious that not every hardware and software manufacturer play nice together.  So instead of dealing with any of this crap any more we decided to take the plunge and buy the newest top of the line converters on the market Avid&#8217;s new HD IO. </span></p>
<p>Check out this article at<a href="http://www.SoundOnSound.com"> SoundOnSound.com</a> about the new converters.</p>
<p>In November&#8217;s review of the new <strong>Avid HD Omni</strong> interface for <strong>Pro Tools HD</strong> systems, we pointed out that although Avid&#8217;s new generation of A-D and  D-A converters clearly sound excellent, making an informed choice  against rivals from Apogee or Prism Sound on the basis of sound quality  alone would require detailed listening tests in a controlled environment  — tests which, unfortunately, we were unable to arrange in the review  timeframe. Fortunately, it turns out that UK Avid resellers <strong>MediaPros</strong> had arranged exactly the sort of blind tests we would have liked to  conduct ourselves. What&#8217;s more, not only had they arranged the loan of  the test units and the studio — Studio A at <strong>Metropolis</strong> —  but they had also brought along some of the UK&#8217;s top engineers and  producers to do the listening. The golden ears in question belonged to  producer <strong>Stephen Street</strong>, mix engineer <strong>Cenzo Townshend</strong>, Abbey Road engineer <strong>Sam Okell</strong> and engineer <strong>Donal Hodgson</strong>, who has recorded much of Sting&#8217;s recent output.</p>
<p>Four units were included in the tests: the new <strong>Avid HD IO</strong> (which has the same A-D and D-A converters as the Omni, and thus should in theory sound identical to it); an original <strong>Digidesign 192 IO</strong> from the previous generation of HD interfaces; a <strong>Prism Sound ADA-8XR</strong>; and the new <strong>Apogee Symphony I/O</strong>, with beta Pro Tools HD drivers.</p>
<p>When the patch cables were unscrambled to reveal the results, it turned  out that the golden ears had indeed picked out the two newest converters  as being the best-sounding. Converter B was revealed to be the Avid HD  IO, while the other favourite on the day, converter D, was the Apogee  Symphony I/O. Most of those present were surprised to see the Prism  ADA-8XR, aka converter A, beaten into third place, but it was perhaps  less of a shock that the 192 I/O came last.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.soundonsound.com/news?NewsID=13352">A/D Converter Shoot Out</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/avid-hd-io-oh-its-on-now/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TribeSound Goes ProTools HD 9</title>
		<link>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/tribesound-goes-protools-hd-9</link>
		<comments>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/tribesound-goes-protools-hd-9#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 01:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gear Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/?p=690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are so excited to offer Protools HD 9 at our studio!!!  We decided it was time to buy a new Mac computer and thought, what the heck, might as well go all the way.  With so many huge improvements in the studio we&#8217;re not sure what to most excited about first!  Read about what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-691" title="Protools HD Logo" src="http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Protools-HD-Logo.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="225" />We are so excited to offer Protools HD 9 at our studio!!!  We decided it was time to buy a new Mac computer and thought, what the heck, might as well go all the way.  With so many huge improvements in the studio we&#8217;re not sure what to most excited about first!  <a href="http://www.soundonsound.com/news?NewsID=13246">Read about what Protools HD can do here. </a></p>
<p><strong>Avid </strong>have announced a new version of their flagship DAW, <strong>Pro Tools HD</strong>, which runs on the host computer’s CPU.</p>
<p><strong>Pro Tools HD Native</strong> has an almost identical feature  set to the existing TDM-powered Pro Tools HD, including full plug-in  delay compensation, support for Avid&#8217;s <strong>Icon</strong>, <strong>D-Command</strong> and <strong>C24</strong> control surfaces, surround-sound mixing and monitoring, and, just like  Pro Tools HD, support for up to 192 audio tracks, 160 auxes and 128  instrument tracks. In fact, one of the only limitations of HD Native  compared with the TDM-powered version is physical I/O count, though HD  Native is still no slouch in that department.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/tribesound-goes-protools-hd-9/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rode K2</title>
		<link>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/rode-k2</link>
		<comments>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/rode-k2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 04:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gear Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/?p=671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rode K2 If anything, the Rode K2 is a hint sweeter-sounding than the NTK, and it definitely does the &#8216;subtle flattery&#8217; thing — which is, after all, why we tolerate tubes inside our microphones in the first place. The way in which it flatters is hard to describe, but, in addition to adding weight to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Rode K2</h3>
<p><img class="size-full wp-image-672 alignleft" title="rodek2" src="http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/rodek2-e1311654788743.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="160" /></p>
<p>If anything, the Rode K2 is a hint sweeter-sounding  than the NTK, and it definitely does the &#8216;subtle flattery&#8217; thing — which  is, after all, why we tolerate tubes inside our microphones in the  first place. The way in which it flatters is hard to describe, but, in  addition to adding weight to what I call the &#8216;chest&#8217; frequencies of the  voice, it also captures the high-end detail in a way that sounds  noticeably smoother and less aggressive than is often the case with  solid-state mics. As with the NTK, the lack of a bass roll-off switch  means you&#8217;ll probably need to engage the low-frequency filter on your  preamp or mixer when recording vocals, and you&#8217;ll certainly need a pop  filter. In fact, pop filters are such essential components of any vocal  recording system that I&#8217;m surprised more mics don&#8217;t come with them —  they&#8217;re just as important as shockmounts, yet we seem to get those  thrown in with nearly every mic we buy these days.</p>
<p>As a vocal mic, the K2 sounds very classy indeed,  and it has been deliberately engineered to be reminiscent of classic  studio mics. It is, however, rather quieter than some of these tube  classics, and probably a lot cheaper to service given that the tubes  used in the Rode mics don&#8217;t belong to an endangered species. This is a  great mic if your voice needs a bit of filling out, or if the high end  of your voice needs rounding off.  I also tried the mic on the usual  acoustic guitar and hand percussion, where it turned in a solid  performance, combining warmth with evenness of tone. I particularly  liked this mic for strummed acoustic guitar played in a pop style, as  you get a punchy, no-nonsense result that sounds almost as though it&#8217;s  been slightly compressed, with no ragged edges.</p>
<p>Read more on <a href="http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/jul04/articles/rodek2.htm">SoundonSound.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/rode-k2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lexicon MX 400XL Effects Processor</title>
		<link>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/lexicon-mx-400xl-effects-processor</link>
		<comments>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/lexicon-mx-400xl-effects-processor#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 04:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gear Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/?p=663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lexicon MX 400XL Lexicon now have two new models in the MX range; the MX400 and the MX400XL, the latter reviewed here. As with the MX200, the new units can use USB or standard MIDI I/O to send patch and control data to and from a suitable computer, while all the audio data must be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Lexicon MX 400XL</h3>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-664" title="Lexicon" src="http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Lexicon-e1311654274543.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="78" /></p>
<p>Lexicon now have two new models in the MX range; the MX400 and the  MX400XL, the latter reviewed here. As with the MX200, the new units can  use USB or standard MIDI I/O to send patch and control data to and from a  suitable computer, while all the audio data must be passed via the  analogue I/O or the included S/PDIF I/O (as Paul&#8217;s review commented,  it&#8217;s a shame that the audio can&#8217;t also be passed via USB, as this would  have allowed a very neat cabling arrangement). However, the MX400 models  can be thought of as the MX200&#8242;s bigger siblings, as they offer  four-channel operation. This can be configured in a number of ways, but  the most obvious difference between the 400 and the 200 is that the 400  can operate as a surround processor (LR front and LR rear) or as two  independent stereo processors (A and B). As with the MX200, each  processor actually features two effects engines, so, for example, while  Processor A might be dedicated to a high-quality reverb (using both  effects engines), Processor B might be used to chain together a delay  (engine one) and a chorus (engine two).</p>
<p>I suspect that most users would predominantly employ the MX400 in Dual  Stereo mode and, therefore, have two independent Lexicon multi-effects  processors available for tracking and mixing duties, from a single rack  unit. However, the MX400&#8242;s Surround mode is more than just a routing  gimmick, and while it might only provide four output channels rather  than five (or six for 5.1), the various factory presets demonstrate that  the unit is more than capable of providing some very convincing  surround reverbs.</p>
<p>Read More at <a href="http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/nov06/articles/lexicon.htm">SoundonSound.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/lexicon-mx-400xl-effects-processor/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neve Portico 5012 and 5033</title>
		<link>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/neve-portico-5012-and-5033</link>
		<comments>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/neve-portico-5012-and-5033#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 04:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gear Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/?p=657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rupert Neve Mic Pre 5012 and Compressor The 5012 is a dual microphone preamplifier with two independent channels, each equipped with the standard facilities, plus a variable high-pass filter. The rear panel features XLRs for the two mic inputs and main line outputs, plus two pairs of TRS quarter-inch sockets for buss linking. There are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Rupert Neve Mic Pre 5012 and Compressor</h3>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-658" title="neve" src="http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/neve-e1311653662372.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="108" /></p>
<p>The 5012 is a dual microphone preamplifier with two independent  channels, each equipped with the standard facilities, plus a variable  high-pass filter. The rear panel features XLRs for the two mic inputs  and main line outputs, plus two pairs of TRS quarter-inch sockets for  buss linking. There are separate linking busses for each mic channel  (labelled A and B), and the two sockets for each allow the buss signal  from another unit to be patched in and then the combined output passed  on to another unit. In essence, this creates a stereo mix buss which is  intended to terminate at a dedicated buss amp-cum-monitoring module,  such as the 5014 MS-stereo buss mix and stereo field module. Since the  interface is unbalanced and high impedance, and operates at a slightly  depressed nominal level compared to the main output, these buss outputs  cannot be used easily for any other purpose.</p>
<p>These Portico units are extremely well engineered, mechanically and  electronically. High-quality components have been used throughout —  nothing really exotic, just good, solid, well-proven devices that do  what they are required to do. The attention to detail and the technical  specifications are faultless and generous. There is massive headroom,  exceptionally low noise floors and careful grounding. There is nothing  frivolous or gimmicky about anything, either. The controls and  interfacing are all clearly designed by someone who understands  precisely what the user needs to do with these tools. And the tools  themselves do exactly what they are intended to do, effectively and  flexibly. In a simple phrase, these are professional products, designed  to deliver professional results to professionals who understand and  appreciate what that term means. Expensive, but very desirable!</p>
<p>Read more at <a href="http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/apr07/articles/rupertneveportico.htm">SoundonSound.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/neve-portico-5012-and-5033/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neumann U87</title>
		<link>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/neumann-u87</link>
		<comments>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/neumann-u87#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 04:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gear Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/?p=653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neumann U87 The Neumann U87 studio Microphone is famous for its warm sound and well-balanced characteristics. Equipped with a large dual-diaphragm capsule with 3 selectable directional patterns: omnidirectional, cardioid, and figure-8, it offers a 6dB improvement in signal-to-noise over its predecessor. A 10dB attenuation switch enables the U87 to handle sound levels up to 127dB [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Neumann U87</h3>
<p><img class="size-full wp-image-654 alignnone" title="neuma" src="http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/neuma-e1311652780511.jpg" alt="" width="120" height="166" /></p>
<p>The Neumann U87 studio Microphone is famous for its warm sound and  well-balanced characteristics. Equipped with a large dual-diaphragm  capsule with 3 selectable directional patterns: omnidirectional,  cardioid, and figure-8, it offers a 6dB improvement in signal-to-noise  over its predecessor. A 10dB attenuation switch enables the U87 to  handle sound levels up to 127dB without distortion; and the low  frequency response can be reduced to compensate for proximity effect.  The preferred studio vocal mic for decades, the Neumann U87 also makes a  great main mic for band or home studio recordings, as well as a spot  mic for single instruments. Frequency range: 20Hz to 20kHz; impedance  rated at 200 ohms.</p>
<p>Read more reviews <a href="http://www.musiciansfriend.com/pro-audio/neumann-u87-ai-shockmount-set-z-microphone-with-box?content=reviews">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/neumann-u87/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sennheiser 421</title>
		<link>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/sennheiser-421</link>
		<comments>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/sennheiser-421#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 03:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gear Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/?p=644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sennheiser 421 The Sennheiser MD421 MKII U4 Mic is one of the best-known mics in the world. Walk into any drum booth in any major studio and you&#8217;ll most likely see MD 421s on the toms. Talk to just about any seasoned FOH or recording engineer about their drum miking preferences for toms and percussion [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><span style="font-size: small;">Sennheiser 421</span></h3>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-645" title="Sennheiser-MD4211" src="http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Sennheiser-MD4211-e1311651785893.jpg" alt="" width="175" height="201" /></p>
<p>The Sennheiser MD421 MKII U4 Mic is one of the best-known mics in the world. Walk into any  drum booth in any major studio and you&#8217;ll most likely see MD 421s on the  toms. Talk to just about any seasoned FOH or recording engineer about  their drum miking preferences for toms and percussion and the name MD 421 will invariably come up. Its excellent sound qualities also enable it  to cope with the most diverse recording conditions and broadcast  applications. The 5-position bass control enhances its all-round  qualities. With very effective feedback rejection and a highly  directional cardioid pickup pattern, placement is a cinch. Rugged  construction.  <a href="http://forum.recordingreview.com/f47/sennheiser-md421-reviews-6037/">Read More</a> on recording review.com</p>
<p>Check out this <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNRp_r1yqFY&amp;feature=related">video</a> we found that tests different mics on electric guitar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/sennheiser-421/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aurora 16 and Aes 16</title>
		<link>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/aurora-16-and-aes-16</link>
		<comments>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/aurora-16-and-aes-16#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gear Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/?p=641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lynx Aurora 16 &#38; AES16 By Martin Walker, From SoundonSound.com: With their Lynx One and Two soundcards (reviewed in SOS November 2000 and March 2002 respectively), Lynx Studio Technology have done more than any other company to dispel the myth that audio converters are inevitably compromised when mounted inside a computer. Lynx products are now [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Lynx Aurora 16 &amp; AES16</h3>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-642" title="Aurora 16" src="http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Aurora-16-e1311638943418.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="133" /></p>
<p>By Martin Walker, From SoundonSound.com:</p>
<p>With their Lynx One and Two soundcards (reviewed in <em>SOS</em> November 2000 and March 2002 respectively), Lynx Studio Technology have  done more than any other company to dispel the myth that audio  converters are inevitably compromised when mounted inside a computer.  Lynx products are now to be found in lots of professional recording and  mastering studios worldwide. However, many studios still use rackmounted  converters or digital mixers, yet with the continued move to  computer-based workstations, need a way to interface these to their Macs  or PCs. With this in mind, Lynx introduced their AES16, which as its  name suggests supports up to 16 input and output channels of AES-EBU  digital audio at sample rates up to 192kHz. Now they have completed the  circle by offering rackmount converters of their own with similarly high  quality to that of their soundcards. The Aurora is available in  eight-channel and 16-channel versions, and has already caused a stir in  the audio community for offering such high quality at significantly  lower prices than some competitors. Partnering Aurora converters with an  AES16 card provides various additional features, which is why I decided  to review them both together.  <a href="http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/jun06/articles/lynx.htm">Read More.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/aurora-16-and-aes-16/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sebatron VMP 4000-e</title>
		<link>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/sebatron-vmp-4000-e</link>
		<comments>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/sebatron-vmp-4000-e#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gear Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/?p=638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sebatron VMP 4000-e Often the hyperbole that precedes a piece of equipment leads one to think that it will be the answer to all their audio dreams. Too often, this anticipation is the best part of the audio purchase. I had been led to believe that the ~Sebatron~ vmp &#8211; 4000 was a high quality [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sebatron VMP 4000-e</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-633" title="sebatron" src="http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/sebatron-e1311638458534.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="48" /></p>
<p>Often the hyperbole that precedes a piece of  equipment leads one to think that it will be the answer to all their  audio dreams. Too often, this anticipation is the best part of the audio  purchase. I had been led to believe that the ~Sebatron~ vmp &#8211; 4000 was a  high quality transparent mic pre of the uncolored purest approach.  While I prefer mic pre’s that color the signal, because I work mainly in  the pop genre’, I understand the need for uncolored mic pre  amplification for acoustic instruments and classical recording  techniques. I can’t tell you how pleasantly surprised I was when I  discovered, that while these pre amps are neutral and natural sounding,  there is much more to them.  <a href="http://recforums.prosoundweb.com/index.php/t/7867/0/">Read More</a></p>
<p>Check out a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zb7fl23vBbo">Video</a> from our friends at Sound Pure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tribesoundrecords.com/sebatron-vmp-4000-e/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

